In a pivotal stand for free speech and the pro-life cause, Life Legal has filed a lawsuit against San Diego’s draconian “buffer zone” law. This ordinance, thinly veiled as a public safety provision, is designed to silence pro-life voices and protect abortion providers from any form of opposition or peaceful protest. The case, Don Blythe v. City of San Diego, challenges this blatant attack on constitutional rights and exposes its dangerous implications for free expression and advocacy for the unborn.
The Evolution of San Diego’s Buffer Zone Laws
San Diego has imposed restrictions on pro-life activity since 1997, following the passage of the federal FACE Act. The original ordinance required pro-lifers to maintain an eight-foot distance from anyone entering an abortion clinic, but only if the individual requested it. This already sweeping measure applied to a 100-foot radius around clinic entrances, effectively silencing many voices.
But that wasn’t enough for abortion advocates. They demanded more—and they got it. In June, Mayor Todd Gloria—whose political ambitions have been supported by none other than Planned Parenthood—signed a new, harsher version into law. This updated ordinance takes aim not just at abortion clinic sidewalks but also at schools and churches, making it even harder for pro-life advocates to share their life-affirming message.
Key Changes: A Chilling Assault on Free Speech
1. Buffer Zones at Schools and Churches
The revised law expands its reach to include schools and churches. While the addition of churches may appear to be a mere public relations move, the targeting of schools is deeply strategic. Pro-life campus outreach is one of the movement’s most effective tools, countering pro-abortion narratives in public schools and offering life-saving resources to young women. These efforts have saved countless lives—making them a prime target for those who profit from abortion.
2. The “Mother-May-I” Rule
Under the new ordinance, pro-life advocates must obtain explicit permission before approaching anyone, even to offer a leaflet or assistance. This is no longer just a buffer zone; it’s a complete barrier to meaningful engagement, forcing advocates to navigate impossible rules that stifle their message.
3. Private Lawsuits to Silence Pro-Lifers:
The ordinance now allows private citizens to sue pro-life advocates for alleged violations. This weaponizes the legal system against peaceful pro-lifers, exposing them to harassment, intimidation, and costly legal battles—all aimed at silencing dissent.
4. Vague Noise Restrictions and Police Dispersal Powers:
The law includes vague restrictions on “loud noises” and grants police sweeping authority to disperse pro-lifers on demand. These measures are not about maintaining public order—they are about suppressing the truth.
Why This Ordinance is Unconstitutional
Life Legal’s lawsuit argues that the ordinance is a direct assault on First Amendment rights. It:
– Suppresses free speech in public forums, where such speech is constitutionally protected.
– Is overly broad and not narrowly tailored to address specific concerns.
– Discriminates based on content, targeting pro-life speech.
– Fails to provide alternative ways for pro-lifers to communicate their message.
We are seeking an immediate temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to halt this law before it can do further damage.
The Media’s Spin and the Truth Behind the Law
Proponents of the ordinance claim it’s necessary to prevent illegal behaviors like obstruction and intimidation—activities that are already against the law. Meanwhile, local media outlets have euphemistically labeled it a “free speech protection” ordinance, misleading the public about its true intent. Make no mistake: this law is designed to protect abortion clinics from the inconvenient truths shared by pro-life advocates.
The Broader Implications: The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher
This isn’t just about one city. If San Diego’s ordinance is allowed to stand, it will set a dangerous precedent for cities across the nation to enact similar laws. The result? Less free speech, fewer opportunities to save lives, and an even greater stranglehold on the truth.
Experience has shown that such laws are enforced selectively. Pro-life advocates are scrutinized and prosecuted for the smallest perceived infractions, while abortion advocates who harass or disrupt churches are ignored. A victory for Life Legal in this case would strike a blow for free speech, saving lives and protecting the constitutional rights of all Americans.
How You Can Help
The fight for free speech and the unborn needs you. Here’s how you can stand with us:
Pray: Pray for the success of this lawsuit and for the courage of all pro-life advocates.
Support: Your financial contributions fuel this critical work. Every dollar helps us protect free speech, defend the unborn, and push back against unjust laws.
Together, we can ensure that truth and life prevail over silence and death. Thank you for standing with us in this vital battle!